Archive for January, 2006

h1

Ex-Parte Petitions

January 5, 2006

Debi has requested that I explain what happens with an ex-parte petition. First, “ex-parte” means “without parent”. In terms of DCYF, it means that the Division feels that a child is in “imminent danger.” The easiest way to explain imminent danger is to provide you with some examples. If a family is living in a tent, and the weather forecast predicts temperatures below zero that evening, that child is in imminent danger. If a child discloses that a family member is having sex with her on a regular basis, and her family does not believe her, that child is in imminent danger. If a child arrives at the hospital with multiple broken bones and discloses that a parent beat them, that child is in imminent danger. I would also like to stress that in any “imminent danger” situation, our first attempt is to find a safe place for the child to stay – either with a non-offending parent, or with a relative. If the family is unable, or unwilling to make arrangements to keep their child or children safe, that is when DCYF asks that the Court step in on an emergency basis. In that situation, the Division would ask the Court to sign their ex-parte petition without a hearing. If the Judge agrees, then DCYF does place children into foster care immediately. Protocol requires that a hearing be held with 24 hours of this petition being files. I have seen some courts interpret this as 24 business hours, so if the petition is filed on a Friday, the hearing would be held on Monday. I have seen some courts interpret it as 24 regular hours, so if the petition is filed on a Friday, the hearing would be held on Saturday.

Ex-Parte petitions are only used when DCYF fears that a child has been harmed, or might be harmed that day. Different offices use ex-parte petitions at different amounts. I can tell you that in my office, we make every attempt to safety plan with the family, to provide them with as many options as we can think of before filing ex-parte petitions. These decisions are never made lightly. We are always aware that even if the situation is unsafe, removing children from a home can be almost as difficult as remaining in the unsafe situation. We never remove children unless we are truly worried for their safety. Even then, it is not DCYF’s decision. As with everything else, a judge must make the decision. All DCYF can do is present to the court the reasons for their concerns, and trust that the court will make the appropriate decision.
dcyf,social work,ex-parte

h1

Deceitful Practices?

January 4, 2006

Debi states in a recent comment that she thinks that my efforts to debunk Attorney Werme’s efforts to “educate” the public are “shameful.” She writes that there are “There are two sides to every situation; the wrong one (DCYF) and the right one (Paula Werme).” Debi is correct that there are two sides to every situation. In my experience, I have found that most often, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. The goal of this blog is to provide people with an insider’s view to DCYF. I think that anyone who hates DCYF so passionately as the Werme’s do has a challenging time remaining objective. I am not sayine that DCYF has never, ever made a mistake, but I do want to make it clear that Attorney Werme’s generalizations of the Division are sterotypical and biased, and while her views may be based of off her experiences with the Division, she has not worked with every single assessment and family service worker in the State of New Hampshire. That being said, she cannot possibly know the outcome of every assessment and every case in the State. I personally have never had the pleasure of working with Attorney Werme. I have attempted to make it clear on this blog, that the information I have provided comes strictly from my own personal experience. As an assessment worker, I am trained to be objective. I am attempting to illustrated in my posts that Attorney Werme’s way is not the only way to do things. I understand that DCYF is sometimes viewed as an adversarial system, but I want people to know that it doesn’t have to be that way, and I personally work very hard with parents to let them know that my goal is to help, not hurt families.
dcyf,social work

h1

Why Let DCYF Into Your Home?

January 3, 2006

Debi made some interesting points in her comments on this blog. She asks a question that I imagine many people might ask – why would anyone want to let DCYF into their home, or allow DCYF to talk to their children? I think there is a simple, straightforward answer to this one: someone, somewhere thought that your children might not be safe – regardless of who this person is, or how factual their information is, they took the time to call in their concerns. As a parent, I would at the very least, want to know what this concern was. Maybe that worker knocking on my door has information about my child being unsafe at a babysitter’s, or at a friend’s house. When DCYF knocks on your door you have no idea if the information they have names you as someone who might not be safe for the child, or if it names someone else, maybe not even someone you are aware of.

Debi also states that “a good portion of the time, it [being involved with DCYF] usually involves a false or vengeful complaint.” I couldn’t give you a statistic, but it is true that many of the calls DCYF receives turn out to be false. It can be anything from someone calling in a complaint that a home is dirty, or has not heat or running water to lack of supervision. Many of these concerns can be cleared up with one cooperative visit with a family. As I have made clear in this blog, I can only speak to my personal experiences with DCYF. As a worker for the Division, I make a point of never visiting a family with any sort of assumptions. That way, if I walk into a home that is supposed to be filthy, and it turns out to be immaculate, I am not surprised, and am able to clear up the confusion quickly.

So, in response to Debi’s question why would anyone open their door and the lives to DCYF? Because DCYF has information about your child that you might want to know. Because I trust that parents truly want to keep their children safe, and want to know whatever it is that might be a concern, and how to address that concern. I hope that parents realize that I am not the enemy, but someone there to help where I can, and ultimately protect children’s safety.
dcyf,social work